• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to navigation
Close Ad

The Spoon

Daily news and analysis about the food tech revolution

  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Connect
    • Custom Events
    • Slack
    • RSS
    • Send us a Tip
  • Advertise
  • Consulting
  • About
The Spoon
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • About

Swiggy

March 4, 2020

Zomato Buys Uber Eats’ India Business for $206M

Uber Eats has sold its India business to food delivery giant Zomato for $206 million, according to an AsiaTechDaily article. The deal was first announced in January, though at the time financial terms were not disclosed. This official price tag on the deal comes from Uber’s latest filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

The deal gives Uber a 9.99 percent stake in Zomato. It also dictates that Uber will shutter its Eats business operations in the Indian market and that its Eats restaurant customers there will become part of the Zomato ecosystem.

From AsiaTechDaily:

Uber said in the filing that the estimated fair value of the consideration received is $206 million, which includes the investment valued at $171 million and the $35 million of reimbursement of goods and services tax receivable from Zomato. 

Uber’s exit from the Indian market leaves just two companies competing for food delivery dominance: Zomato and its key rival, Naspers-backed Swiggy, which is India’s number one food delivery service according to estimates. Both companies process roughly half a million more orders daily than Eats had been doing in India. 

The Indian market won’t stay a duopoly for long, though. Just days ago, Amazon announced it plans to enter the Indian food delivery market with a service that would be offered as part of either its Prime Now or Amazon Fresh platform. Said service could launch as soon as this month. While the company’s entry into the market wouldn’t be a complete breeze, given both Swiggy and Zomato’s popularity, if anyone has the deep pockets and operational prowess to crush that duopoly, it’s Amazon.

Amazon aside, the Zomato-Uber Eats deal is also another step in the food delivery industry’s move towards further consolidation as these cash-burning services back out of loss-making markets. India isn’t the first market where Uber Eats has shuttered its services. In 2019, the company got out of South Korea, where Woowa Bros.’ Baedal Minjok has a 75 percent marketshare. Also in 2019, Postmates shuttered its Mexico City office.

Elsewhere, UK-based Just Eat merged with Takeaway.com to form one of the largest food delivery services in the world, and Woowa Bros. itself was bought by Delivery Hero at the end of December. These, along with the Uber Eats-Zomato deal are certainly not the last we’ll hear of mergers, acquisitions, and closings, as consolidation in the food delivery space continues. 

January 22, 2020

Newsletter: Consolidation Is Imminent for Food Delivery, Plus Customize is Coming to NYC

This is the web version of our weekly newsletter. Sign up for it and get all the best food tech news delivered directly to your inbox each week!

If 2019 was the year restaurant food delivery companies went mainstream, 2020 is shaping up to be the year mergers and acquisitions whittle the competition among these third-party services down until just a couple companies emerge victorious.

Case in point: this week, Uber announced it is selling its Eats business in India to Zomato, a local rival that processes at least half a million more orders per day in that country than Eats does. Uber’s exit from the Indian market leaves just two major players: Zomato (which Uber will have a small stake in) and Swiggy, who also has access to deep pockets thanks to backing from investment firm Naspers.

And that news is just the latest in a series of announcements that all suggest acquisitions and mergers are the fuel pushing further consolidation worldwide in the crowded food delivery space. The ongoing bidding war over UK-based service Just Eat looks to finally be at an end, with Takeaway.com, who originally planned to acquire the company, coming out as the winner. The combined entity of Just Eat and Takeaway.com would form one of the largest food delivery companies in the world. In the States, Postmates has reportedly been exploring a sale instead of its planned IPO (which still hasn’t happened). A Wall Street Journal report from earlier this month said Grubhub had hired financial advisors to consider “strategic options including a possible sale” — though Grubhub denies the claim.

Uber’s motivation in the Zomato deal is in part all about cutting back on loss-making operations as the cash-burning business comes under increasing pressure to prove profitability over the next year. On that score, the company isn’t alone. Postmates shuttered its Mexico City operations in December. Deliveroo closed up shop in Germany last year. In 2018, Delivery Hero sold its German operations to Takeaway.com. And Uber itself ended its Eats business in South Korea last year.

Consider all that activity the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Most delivery companies are currently in the same boat as Uber, where investors are applying pressure to show the food delivery model can in fact be profitable and not just burn through money. So it’s safe to say that many services will continue shutting down or selling loss-heavy operations around the globe over the next several months and opening the door to further consolidation.  

At-home Indoor Farming Is Suddenly the New Black

There’s a new trend afoot in the connected kitchen: vertical farms built specifically for the home and meant to be used by your average consumer. 

Ever since CES, when major appliance-makers like LG and GE showed off flashy vertical farming concepts for the consumer kitchen of the future, here at The Spoon we’ve gotten a seemingly endless series of pitches and news announcements about this indoor-farm-to-table concept. The idea is simple: make an indoor farm that ranges anywhere between a flowerpot and a bookshelf in size, outfit it with accompanying technology that automates much of the actual work around growing the plants, and sell the product to consumers for, in most cases, under $1,000.

In the last several weeks alone, Rise Gardens, the Planty Cube, Miele, and many others have shown off products that hit these marks. But while there’s a lot of excitement (bordering on hype) around growing salad greens in your own kitchen, the still-nascent market hasn’t yet hit the point where the questions start to sprout up. Are these farms really as easy to use and automated as companies say? Can they actually save people money? Can individuals with a terrible track record when it comes to gardening (me) grow something that actually tastes good?

The next several months should provide some answers to these questions. 

Customize Is Almost Here!

That’s a wrap for this week. But before I go, here’s a quick reminder that we’re gearing up for Customize, our first NYC event. Personalization is changing everything from restaurants to grocery stores to our own kitchens, so join the Spoon team and our amazing group of speakers on February 27th! Just use the special Spoon subscriber discount code THESPOON15 for a 15% discount off of tickets. 

Keep growing,

Jenn


January 21, 2020

Uber Sells Its Eats India Business to Rival Zomato

Consolidation in the food delivery sector continues. Today, Uber said it was selling its Eats business in India to local rival service Zomato, according to an article from TechCrunch. The deal, which is valued between $160 million and $200 million, is effective immediately. 

The two companies have been in talks since November of 2019. With the deal, Uber will own a 9.99 percent stake in Zomato. It will shutter all operations in the Indian market, with Eats customers and restaurants becoming part of Zomato. According to TC, some Eats employees will have the option to join Uber’s ride-hailing service. The rest will be let go.

For Uber, a big part of the motivation behind the sale is to cut back on loss-making operations as it struggles to reach profitability by 2021. The company’s Eats business launched in India in 2017 but faces strong competition not just from Zomato but also another local service, Prosus-backed Swiggy. Both those competitors fulfill well over 1 million orders each day, while Uber Eats only does about half a million. 

The move to shutter operations in India is similar to Uber Eats’ decision in September 2019 to shutter operations in South Korea, where Woowa Bros.’ food delivery service Baedal Minjok owns 75 percent of the market share. 

Meanwhile, both competition and consolidation worldwide in the food delivery sector continues to intensify. In Europe, Uber Eats will have to contend with Just Eat and Takeaway.com, two companies merging to become one of the largest food delivery services in the world. Deliveroo is also a major competitor in that market. In the U.S., Uber Eats still lags behind DoorDash and Grubhub in terms of marketshare. 

All of these companies face an increasing amount of pressure to become profitable. And given the trend towards consolidation happening of late, India might not be the last market Uber Eats bows out of in the near future. 

December 16, 2019

Uber Is in Talks to Sell Its Uber Eats Business in India to Zomato

Food delivery service Zomato is in talks to buy Uber Eats’ India business, sources familiar with the matter told TechCrunch. The deal values Uber Eats’ India business at $400 million currently, and the rideshare giant would potentially be able to invest $150 to $200 million in Zomato.

The deal comes as Uber Eats struggles to stay competitive in India, where it is currently the number three player behind Zomato and Prosus-backed food delivery service Swiggy. Uber Eats currently makes roughly half a million deliveries each day, while its competitors each do well over 1 million orders daily.

Uber has been in talks with Zomato since November of this year. 

India isn’t the first country Uber Eats has backed out of. In September of this year, the company shuttered its business in South Korea, citing “competitive pressures” most notably from Woowa Bros.’ Baedal Minjok food delivery service. (The South Korean market got a further shot of consolidation last week when Woowa announced plans to acquire Delivery Hero for $4 billion.)

Uber posted over $1 billion in losses on its most recent earnings call, where it also noted that its Eats business was still losing enormous amounts of money. In India, the company projected a negative revenue of $107.5 million for Uber Eats between August and December of this year, according to TechCrunch. The company also announced layoffs, which included Uber Eats team members, in October. 

Uber and Zomato are still finalizing terms of the deal, which could go through before the end of this year. The $150 to $200 million investment would give Uber a sizable stake in the Zomato and therefore entry back into India’s food delivery market. The combined forces of Zomato and Uber Eats would make for the largest food delivery service in India, ahead of Swiggy.

December 8, 2019

Spoon Market Map: Ghost Kitchens in 2019

Just half a decade ago, the phrase “ghost kitchen” referred to restaurants that looked legit on Grubhub and Seamless but were actually digital fronts for unregulated kitchens. In other words, chicken tenders from what appeared to be a local restaurant might actually have been cooked in someone’s apartment.

Then the delivery boom went off, thanks largely to the growth of third-party services like Grubhub and DoorDash, and by the many digital channels through which customers could suddenly get food. Order tickets proliferated for restaurants, but so too did the stress around how to fulfill those orders without over-burdening the in-house kitchen staff.

The answer to the problem? Take the restaurant out of the kitchen.

In the last few years, restaurants have been moving many of their operations around delivery and to-go orders to dedicated kitchen spaces outside the main restaurant location. The name “ghost kitchen” has stuck around, but now it’s a health-department-friendly term for these spaces that act as hubs for off-premises orders.

But actually, there are many names nowadays for the concept: ghost kitchen, virtual kitchen, cloud kitchen, the (slightly nauseating) description “kitchen as a service.” All those phrases amount the same thing: a kitchen facility that exists solely for the purpose of helping restaurants cook and fulfill to-go orders and get them into the hands of delivery couriers. There is no dining room or front-of-house staff in a ghost kitchen, the tech-stack is more streamlined than that of a full-service restaurant, and, increasingly, the location is completely separate from a restaurant’s dine-in location(s). Now, too, there are also kitchens on (literal) wheels, which add yet-another piece of mobility to the business model. 

To help you navigate the evolving world of ghost kitchens, we’ve created a market map for your reference. This market map is intended to be a snapshot of the current ghost kitchen landscape in 2019. It’s not comprehensive, and we expect both it and the overall landscape to change drastically over the next 12 months. That means you can expect to see this map updated regularly. As always, we welcome suggestions for additional companies and players in this space.

Have suggestions? Drop us an email.

1. Kitchen Infrastructure Providers

The largest category in ghost kitchens right now, Kitchen Infrastructure Providers can be likened to cloud computing providers: they rent companies the space and tools needed to run a business, either as a flat-fee model for on a pay-as-you-go basis. 

Kitchen United, for example, charges a monthly membership fee that includes rent, equipment, storage, and services like dishwashing. Reef, which originally made a name for itself reinventing the concept of the parking garage, offers these things as well as direct partnerships with major third-party delivery companies like DoorDash and Postmates.   

Normally these facilities are large, warehouse-like buildings that hold multiple “restaurants” under a single roof. For large restaurant operators with multiple chains looking to fulfill extra demand brought on by delivery or test out new concepts without incurring too much risk, these are ideal.

Multi-unit chains can also use these spaces to reach customers in areas where they might not have a brick-and-mortar store. Chick-fil-A is widening its reach in the SF Bay Area by working out of DoorDash’s newly opened facility.

2. Restaurant-operated Kitchens

For some restaurants, running a ghost kitchen operation themselves makes more sense than teaming up with a third-party kitchen provider. This is often the case with smaller, independent restaurants, whose ghost kitchen might consist of nothing more than an area of the restaurant’s existing location(s) dedicated to fulfilling off-premises orders. Or it might apply to multi-unit chains who simply want to expand to new areas and don’t have the capital or inclination to deal with the burden of a full-service restaurant. Colombian chain Muy is one such company, having started as a dine-in restaurant before expanding its ghost kitchens to serve more areas of Latin America.

The most notable of all the companies in this category right now is Starbucks. In addition to building out “to-go” stores that exist solely for the purpose of fulfilling off-premises orders, the company has also partnered with Alibaba to turn parts of the latter’s Hema supermarkets into ghost kitchens in China.

The boundaries around this category are especially fluid. In other words, just because you operate your own ghost kitchen in one part of the country doesn’t mean you can’t team up with a third-party provider in another, as The Halal Guys and Chick-fil-A have done.

3. Virtual Restaurant Providers

This is where the lines really start to blur between restaurant, kitchen provider, and delivery company. Anyone can make a virtual restaurant, and as the category in our map shows, more than just restaurants are trying their hand at food concepts that can only be ordered through digital channels and are prepared in a ghost kitchen. Whole30, for example, is a diet concept better known for its cookbooks than its dealings with the restaurant industry. The folks behind that brand teamed up with Grubhub and restaurant company Lettuce Entertain You to create a virtual restaurant offering meals with Whole30-approved foods. 

On the other hand, a company like Keatz runs a network of virtual restaurants it houses beneath the roof of its own ghost kitchens. Taster, based out of France, creates native restaurant brands for food delivery companies like Uber Eats and Deliveroo. Food is cooked in Taster-run kitchens.

4. Mobile Kitchens

In slightly more its own category, companies like Ono Food Co. and Zume are creating robotic, self-contained kitchens on wheels that offer restaurant experiences that can be tailored to specific neighborhoods in a city and also plug into third-party delivery services.

Restaurants can also partner with these kitchens on wheels to expand their reach into new markets, as &Pizza has done by teaming up with Zume.

What’s Next for Ghost Kitchens

Ghost kitchens will become the norm for multi-unit chains. With off-premises orders expected to drive the majority of restaurant sales growth over the next decade, multi-unit brands (think Panera, Chipotle, etc.) will find ghost kitchens a cost-effective way to meet this demand without overburdening existing restaurants. The majority of them will rent space from kitchen infrastructure providers, as Chick-fil-A is currently doing with DoorDash. 

There will be an explosion of delivery-only brands. Since ghost kitchens provide a cheaper, faster way for food entrepreneurs and small restaurants alike to test-drive new concepts, we will see an influx of delivery- and pickup-only brands come out of these kitchens over the next year. Many will be born inside the walls of facilities like Kitchen United or CloudKitchens. Meanwhile, the number of virtual restaurant networks like that of Keatz will increase. 

Artificial Intelligence will be designed into the kitchen. AI is a really broad term that’s often misused. That fact aside, its presence in the restaurant industry is here to stay, and in ghost kitchens, it will prove itself valuable for everything from tracking ingredients to helping staff curb food waste. On the consumer end, we expect to see the technology more deeply integrated into the apps and websites from which customers order, improving recommendations and upselling opportunities.  

More non-restaurant food brands will launch virtual restaurants. In keeping with a trend recently made popular by Whole30 and Bon Apétit, food brands, diets, celebrity chefs, and other non-restaurant businesses will team up with third parties to launch delivery and pickup concepts. Grubhub and Uber Eats are two such third parties already doing this. Expect many more such partnerships — soon.

Bonus: The tech stack will get pared down. No front of house means no POS, right? Quite possibly. With less (or no) customer-facing technology like digital menu boards, self-order kiosks, and tabletop ordering, much of the restaurant tech on the market today becomes irrelevant in a ghost kitchen setting. As the folks at Reforming Retail noted recently, “under this scenario the POS is just an ordering node in the cloud that outputs your menu to a consumer and sends orders to your kitchen.”

That doesn’t mean restaurant tech is going by the wayside. Some ghost kitchens, like those of Muy, have a walkup option where customers order at kiosks onsite, and there will doubtless be new solutions created that are specifically for the ghost kitchen. But the tools of tomorrow’s ghost kitchen won’t look a thing like today’s bloated restaurant-management tech stack. For everyone involved, that’s a bonus.

September 4, 2019

Swiggy Goes Beyond Food Delivery With New Service Swiggy Go, Expands Swiggy Stores

Today, India-based delivery service Swiggy took a few steps beyond the food world by launching Swiggy Go, an instant pickup and drop-off service that will deliver everything from laundry to house keys.

Swiggy Go is similar to another service, Swiggy Stores, which the company launched in February of 2019 for delivering household items like groceries and medicine within a one-hour timeframe. It’s also another example of a food delivery company branching out from restaurant food in an effort to become a kind of delivery superpower that can get any item to any person in major cities.

In India, Swiggy competes most closely with another food delivery service, Zomato, but adding non-food items to its delivery capabilities means it will also now be competing with Google-backed concierge service Dunzo, who operates in a handful of cities in India.

Food tech investment in India in general is heating up. In August, ecommerce startup FreshToHome raised a $20 million Series B round. Amazon said in July it is planning to launch a restaurant-delivery service in the country later this year, and Zomato successfully tested a drone pilot this past summer.

It’s possible Swiggy’s sudden move into non-food items is an effort to stand above the rising competition levels in India and become the go-to service in India not just for restaurant meals but for anything a person could want conveniently dropped at the front door. That may be necessary as heavyweights like Amazon — a name basically synonymous with conveniences — plans its moves in the country.

We’re seeing a similar trend start to take shape here in the States: last week, DoorDash announced it is working with Mercato to delivery groceries in 22 different states. It could be only a matter of time before Dashers start dropping non-perishables at your door, too. The next big question is, Will other third-party delivery services do the same?

Swiggy Go is currently available in Bengaluru. The company said it plans to expand the service to over 300 cities. Meanwhile, Swiggy stores will be available in all major metro areas by 2020.

Previous

Primary Sidebar

Footer

  • About
  • Sponsor the Spoon
  • The Spoon Events
  • Spoon Plus

© 2016–2025 The Spoon. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
 

Loading Comments...