• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to navigation
Close Ad

The Spoon

Daily news and analysis about the food tech revolution

  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Connect
    • Custom Events
    • Slack
    • RSS
    • Send us a Tip
  • Advertise
  • Consulting
  • About
The Spoon
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • About

Wild Type

June 10, 2025

Tasting Cultivated Seafood in London’s East-end

In London’s East End, a food revolution is bubbling – a high-tech movement promising to change our way of life. Although still in its infancy, with significant early-stage obstacles to overcome, it could become the biggest agricultural disruptor since the advent of farming. I’m talking about cellular agriculture – meat, fish, milk, proteins, and fats – grown in bioreactors, rather than in farmyards.

Recently, I was invited to try it for myself, and I was keen to give it a go. 

The invitation read, “We would like to invite you to an intimate tasting experience hosted by Umami Bioworks (Umami).” It continued, “At this tasting, you will have the opportunity to sample two of our signature product categories: Cultivated White Fish — prepared in a classic fish & chips style. Cultivated Caviar — traditionally presented to highlight its sensory experience.”

Umami is a Singapore-based cultivated seafood company with offices in Japan, the USA, and Europe. It’s applying for approval to sell cultivated fish in several jurisdictions, including the UK, South Korea, the USA, and Singapore. Umami is partnering with Nestle Purina in line with its ambition to launch a tuna-flavoured pet food in the UK.

On 28th May this year, Wildtype’s salmon became the first cultivated seafood to be made available to consumers anywhere in the world , having received approval from the FDA, and the third cultivated protein to enter the US market. But because Umami doesn’t yet have regulatory approval, tastings of its cultivated seafood are by invitation only. 

Twelve of us were seated at the table in the trendy East London basement kitchen, which gleamed with polished utensils, pans, and white tiles, and unsurprisingly smelled of cooking fish. The director of food science, Dr Lou Kutzler, was in the kitchen overseeing the cooking process, which, he assured us, was just like cooking any normal piece of fish fillet.

Having verbally agreed that we had no allergies, we signed a consent form. The same document outlined the purpose of the tasting, which was “to assess the sensory properties and overall product acceptability of cell-cultivated seafood products prior to their market launch.”   

We grilled the CEO, Mihir Pershad, and Dr Lou Kutzler as we awaited our first dish – about cell lines, flavours, and ingredients. Mihir answered with cautious frankness. Although he was unable to tell us what the scaffold was, what the hybrid sections of the dish consisted of, nor what percentage of the fillet was cultivated, he did try to answer our questions, and seemed genuinely interested to know what we thought of the food.

Beer Battered Cultivated Fish Fillet

The fish was cooked in beer batter and arranged delicately on the plate, alongside a block of sculpted chips, some red cabbage, and a dollop of tartar sauce. As I bit into the fish, a shiver washed over my back and face – perhaps it was the momentousness of the event itself, or maybe it was a sense of trepidation. After all, I was about to eat something which very few people in the world had ever tried – and which hadn’t been approved for consumption anywhere. And what’s more, because we knew little about its contents we were eating it blind, on trust.

So how did it taste?


Beer Battered Cultivated Fish Fillet

Beer Battered Cultivated Fish Fillet

The product tasted just like fish. It looked and smelled like fish, too. The texture and mouth-feel, however, was slightly off the mark – a little harder and more jelly-like – not as flaky as white fish should normally be. Lou assured us that the texture and mouth-feel could be resolved at the production stage. I’ve heard this critique before from people who have tasted the chicken equivalent, in the USA and Singapore – the mouth-feel dilemma.

The market for seafood, in the UK alone, was worth £10 billion in 2023, according to the Marine Management Organisation, and worldwide the numbers are enormous. Cultivated fish has been listed by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) as a potential solution to currently damaging fishing practices, and to the massive depletion in stock, especially tuna. WWF reported that bluefin tuna have “been overfished to near extinction globally, and if not managed effectively, the world’s tuna fisheries face an ecological disaster.” Umami recently announced a cultivated tuna co-development partnership with Japanese company Maruha Nichiro , the world’s biggest seafood company and a leading supplier of tuna.

Back in central London, where one cultivated fish product would have been plenty for our adventurous palettes, we were being served up a second helping of cell-grown caviar. We had been briefed that the dish was a top-end, Beluga-like caviar product – a more subtle tasting, creamier and less fishy caviar than others. We were told Beluga caviar melts in your mouth, rather than bursts like the cheaper variety. It was served with sour cream on blinis, arranged delicately on a fancy spoon. Since none of us had tasted Beluga, we all agreed the cultivated caviar didn’t live up (or down) to our experiences – it had less flavour and the consistency was more soluble. Unfortunately, the sour cream and blini somewhat overpowered it. Perhaps we weren’t the right people to appreciate the product given our inexperienced tastes. 

Cell-Cultivated Caviar

Cultivated caviar seems, at least price-wise, like a sensible product to launch, as cultivated foods will (at least in the early days) be sold at a premium, until scale-up brings the price down. But I couldn’t help wondering whether the appeal of this luxury caviar, to those wealthy individuals able to afford it, is at least in part the way it’s sourced. Would cultivating it reduce the requisite exotic appeal? However, we were assured by Mihir that a growing popularity amongst Gen Z is a potentially encouraging market. 

Singapore was the first to approve the sale of cultivated meat back in 2020, followed in the USA in 2022 for Upside Food and Good Meat, and last year for Mission Barn’s cultivated fats. Also last year, Aleph Farms received approval from Israeli regulator to sell cultivated beef, and in the same year, the UK became the first in the world to approve the sale of cultivated meat for pets, for company Meatly. Other UK cultivated meat companies are awaiting approval from the FSA, including Ivy Farm and Hoxton Farms – developing beef fats. 

Cultivated meat and dairy companies face significant headwinds regarding capital funding, a largely negative media, and regulatory hurdles, but there are signs of encouragement from governments who see it as a net zero contributor. The UK is fast becoming a frontrunner in Europe with initiatives like the Cellular Agriculture Manufacturing Hub and the Bezos Centre for Sustainable Protein. Last year also saw the opening of the £38 million National Alternative Protein Innovation Centre (NAPIC) which works to advance research and innovation in areas like cultured meat, plant-based proteins, insect-based proteins, and fermented proteins, derived from sources other than animals. In addition, the FSA sandbox programme was also launched last year, and invited 8 companies, including BluNalu, Most Meat, Vow, Gourmey, and Hoxton Farms, to help inform and develop a robust system of regulation for cultivated novel foods. 

Following the event on City Road, I said goodbye to my fellow tasters and headed to the HYLO Building, in EC1. It was just 10 minutes on foot and is home to Hoxton Farms. There, I met with, CEO, co-founder (and former Future of Foods Interviews guest) Max Jamilly, who had agreed to give me a tour. 

Max Jamilly – Co-Founder Hoxton Farms

Jamilly is a scientist and a businessman, with a PhD in Synthetic Biology from the University of Oxford and two master’s degrees from the University of Cambridge in biotechnology and business. He has a background in venture capital, which almost certainly assisted Hoxton Farms in raising an impressive $35 million in funding. Though significant, this is a fraction compared to the heady days of 2020 when the likes of Mosa Meat and Good Meat were raising hundreds of millions. 2024 saw record-low levels of venture capital investment in this space, so to secure this sum is impressive for Hoxton. Jamilly assured me that he isn’t fazed by the current lack of investment in the industry and expects a turnaround. 

The scale of the project is very impressive, and much of what happens inside is commercially and technically sensitive, hidden from external view by a privacy glass façade. I was allowed one photograph outside the lab, then I was decked out in laboratory gear – hat and gown, shoe coverings and gloves, and led from the wide open-plan offices into the technical guts of the building. It was made clear that any contamination would be catastrophic, destroying entire batches, so although the air filtration system worked almost unnoticed in the background, it was described to me as one of the most impressive parts of the whole set up. I was taken into the laboratory and given a brief explanation of the process, shown the old bioreactors and the new ones, and introduced to the engineers who were building them on site. I was shown the kitchen area where the cultivated fats were being turned into products by an in-house chef, Josh Hatfield. 

Hoxton Farm’s next move, according to Jamilly, is a new facility in Singapore where their regulatory application is ongoing. According to Jamilly, having a facility in Singapore makes things easier for the Singapore regulators to do their inspections and examinations, but also allows Hoxton Farms to produce it’s cultivated beef fats locally for sale, not just for Singapore but eventually into the wider Asia market. 

Research carried out internally by cultivated meat company, Aleph Farms, indicates that acceptance of cultivated meat is significantly more positive in Asia than in the west. Perhaps recent events in the USA have also added to this fresh eastern-promise. And Singapore appears to be ahead of the game, not just because it has a well established, globally respected Novel Food Regulatory Framework, and is selling cultivated meat into retail, but also because it’s been perceived by global companies as a gateway into Asia. It’s generally accepted that getting approval in Singapore could be persuasive with other countries in the region, when it comes to regulation. But it appears to be a two way street, because as western companies like Hoxton Farms look to Singapore and Asia for a market – so too are those Asian companies such as Umami Bioworks, being drawn to the UK, which could also become a significant player.

Alex Crisp is a writer, podcaster, and facilitator – host of Future of Foods Interviews.

October 13, 2020

SKS 2020: What Does It Take to Build a Cell-Based Protein Business?

If you keep an eye and ear to food tech, you’ll know there’s been a significant uptick in interest (and investment) for cell-based meat products. But what can companies in the space do to help cell-based protein scale to address issues like global food security and environmental sustainability? 

That’s a topic FTW Ventures’ Brian Frank discussed at this week’s SKS 2020 show, where he was joined by Benjamina Bollag, the founder and CEO of HigherSteaks, and Justin Kolbeck, CEO and cofounder of Wild Type. 

Since both Bollag and Kolbeck have founded cell-based meat companies (HigherSteaks is working on bacon and pork belly, Wild Type on salmon), they had a ton to say — more than can realistically be packed into a few hundred words.

Kolbeck summarized his advice by pointing to three things companies can think about: taste, affordability, and building the kind of story around the product that will attract your average consumer. For example, when we reach that far-off day where cell-based seafood is available at your local Publix, its branding might explain to shoppers that it contains zero mercury or antibiotics, or that it’s a more sustainable solution to wild-caught seafood from our oceans (which are overfished).

“The role of brands will be important to differentiate and distinguish between companies,” he said.

I say “far-off day” because no one is going to stroll into Publix tomorrow, or even next year, expecting to find cell-based meat and seafoods. All panelists agreed the timeframe for that reality is years away.

Part of the reason for that is the cost required to produce cell-based proteins. Bollag mentioned media — the liquid that gets fed to cells to make them grow — as one challenge. Growing those cell in bioreactors at scale is another massive hurdle, as is developing the scaffolding to give products the correct meat-like texture.

One thing that could address all of those tasks and challenges isn’t even a technology. It’s simply the concept of not doing everything in-house. A company that develops its own media, builds its own bioreactors, and simultaneously tries to navigate the regulatory challenges for cell-based meat is going to be slow in reaching commercialization. “Developing the IP yourself is not the most efficient way to do that,” said Kolbeck. Frank was even more to the point: “Cell-based [meat] companies cannot develop all the IP themselves.”

That presents a real opportunity for many kinds of businesses to get involved in the growth of cell-based meat, from those building bioreactors to companies developing cheaper serums to lawyers with expertise in the regulatory realm. All of those individuals and companies working together can help accelerate the timeline between now and when cell-based protein products reach our grocery store shelves. Only then can the planet and the population start to reap the widespread benefits of cell-based meat as an option.

September 29, 2020

Singapore’s Shiok Meats Raises $12.6M in Series A Funding

Cell-based seafood maker Shiok Meats announced today it has raised $12.6 million in Series A funding. The round was led by Aqua-Spark, an investment fund focused on sustainable aquaculture. SEEDS Capital, Real Tech Fund, Irongrey, and several others also participated in the round, according to a press release sent to The Spoon. This brings Shiok Meats’ total funding so far to $20.2 million.

Shiok Meats said it will put the new funds towards building its commercial pilot plant, from which the company plans to launch its minced shrimp product in 2022. 

Shrimp is one of the most widely consumed seafood types in the world. For now, at least, Shiok Meats says it is the only company in the world creating a cell-based version that’s grown outside the animal. The company’s process involves isolating stem cells from the shrimp then growing them inside nutrient-rich bioreactors. 

It joins a growing list of cell-based protein producers that have raised funds over the last year, including Blue Nalu, Good Catch, and Wild Type.

For all of these companies, price remains a major hurdle to getting products to market: cell-based protein is simply an expensive process right now that makes it impossible to get products to price parity with traditional seafood offerings. On its own website, Shiok meats notes that a limited production scale is in part responsible for the high costs of its cell-based shrimp. Scaling up production will help the company bring down costs.

Shiok recently partnered with IntegriCulture to use the latter’s CultNet System to create shrimp cell cultures. Doing so brings down the overall cost of cell-based shrimp production, since it doesn’t require expensive animal serums normally used for the process. 

Shiok did a first public taste testing of cell-based shrimp dumplings last year, to positive reviews. The rest of us will have to wait a little longer. The company’s initial products will be frozen cell-based shrimp meat for dumplings and other shrimp-based dishes. In the coming years, the company also plans to launch shrimp flavoring pastes and powders, fully formed 3D shrimp, and cell-based lobster and crab products.

September 12, 2020

Food Tech News: Wild Type Is Looking for Chefs, White Castle Is Offering Rewards

Some final bits of food tech news from ’round the web this week:

Wild Type Has a Pre-Order List for Chefs

While still a good five years out from commercial production, Wild Type said this week it has opened a pre-order list for chefs wanting to include the company’s cell-based seafood into their dishes. Right now, the company is developing a cultured salmon prototype that would work in sushi dishes. Wild Type cofounder Justin Kolbeck clarified that the company is not launching its product, just “releasing news” that they “have the next iteration of the product.

White Castle Launches a Rewards Program

White Castle has launched its first-ever rewards platform, called “the Craver Nation loyalty program.” Like other digital rewards programs out there, Craver Nation will offer discounts and deals to loyal customers that sign up for the White Castle mobile app. The program was trialed earlier this summer in Louisville, Ky. and is another digital tool in the chain’s quickly-growing arsenal of them.

Asia-based abillionveg Raises Fresh Funding

Singapore-based app abillionveg announced this week that it has closed a $3 million pre-Series A round, with participation from Nan Fung Group, CloudKitchens, and York Capital. The app features community-led reviews for vegan and vegetarian products, including both retail and restaurant offerings. Simultaneous to the funding news, the company announced it has struck partnerships with plant-based heavyweight Impossible Foods and restaurant-booking platform Chope.

Cornucopia Farms Is Building a Large-Scale Hydroponic Farm in Georgia

Leafy green lovers, take note. Marietta, Ga.-based Cornucopia Farms said this week it is completing construction on a 56,000-square-foot hydroponic farm two hours east of Atlanta. The farm will grow all manner of greens, including herbs, Romaine, and Bibb lettuce, among other types, and will produce an estimated 12 million heads of leafy greens and 2 million pounds of herbs per year when it is completed. That won’t be for a minute, though: completion of the project is expected at some point in the latter half of 2021.

July 30, 2020

As Cell-Based Protein Becomes a Reality, What to Call it Gets Increasingly Important

Last week we briefly covered news about a Rutgers study that found “cell-based” the best descriptor for lab-grown seafood products. Further thought and reading on the matter leads me to believe the study’s findings have implications for labeling across all of the cell-based protein space, not just seafood.

Here’s a quick recap: A new study by Rutgers in the Journal of Food Science recommends “Companies seeking to commercialize seafood products made from the cells of fish or shellfish should use the term ‘cell-based’ on product labels.”

The study, commissioned by cell-based seafood company BlueNalu, claims to be the first of its kind evaluating how to label alternative seafood products in a way that both appeals to consumers and meets regulatory requirements around product naming. The study was done by William Hallman, a professor who chairs the Department of Human Ecology at Rutgers-New Brunswick’s School of Environmental and Biological Sciences. He noted this week that participants in the study were able to tell the label “cell-based” apart from ones like “wild caught” or “farm raised,” and that those participants still believed the cell-based products were as nutritious as the others. 

Other names tested in the study were “cell-cultured seafood” and “cultivated seafood,” as well as phrases like “cultivated from the cells of ____” and “grown directly from the cells of ____.”

It’s not hard to understand why “cell-based seafood” resonates the most with consumers. The above phrases lack the kind of concise description needed for food products, and terms like “cultivated seafood” are rather muddy in terms of describing what goes into making the product. 

This question of labeling is only going to get bigger as cell-based proteins move further from concept and into a culinary reality for average consumers. We’ve already seen this play out to some degree with plant-based proteins. About a year ago, large meat corporations were pushing hard to ban their plant-based counterparts from using words like “burgers” and “sausages” on packaging. As we wrote previously, “Big Meat trying to quash alterna-meats’ popularity by telling companies how they can or can’t label themselves feels protectionist and ineffective, not to mention desperate, at this point.” 

And that was before the pandemic. Since COVID-19 hit and shed an uncomfortably bright light on issues in traditional meat production, demand for alternative proteins has been through the roof. Just this week, investment network FAIRR released a report stating investment in alt-protein for the first half of 2020 is nearly double the amount for all of 2019. That includes cell-based protein.

Whether Big Seafood pushes back on labeling now that more cell-based seafood is coming to market remains to be seen. It will certainly have a lot of opponents if it does. BlueNalu just announced a new facility designed for commercial production of its alt-seafood products. Wild Type raised a $12.5 million Series A round last year for its cultured salmon, and Shiok Meats just partnered with Integriculture to scale up production of lab-grown shrimp. And those are only the seafood-focused players in the cell-cultured protein space.

Big Seafood aside, effective labeling of all these products — and all cell-based protein products, really — will be key to appealing to new consumers who may not have previously known about cell-based meat and dairy, and that it’s just as nutritious as the real deal. When it comes to finding a name for these alt-protein items, that could be the most difficult and most rewarding challenge companies face.  

October 8, 2019

Wild Type Raises $12.5M Series A to Accelerate Production of its Cultured Salmon

Wild Type, a startup developing cultured salmon (that is, fish grown from cells outside the animal), announced today that it had raised a $12.5 million Series A funding round. The round was led by CRV with participation from Maven Ventures, Spark Capital and Root Ventures, the last two of which had previously invested in Wild Type. This would bring the total amount of funding raised by the company to $16 million.

Founded in 2016, Wild Type currently has a team of 16. We spoke with co-founders Justin Kolbeck and Aryé Elfenbein last week to learn more about how the San Francisco-based startup will leverage their funding. According to Kolbeck, who serves as CEO, their first priority is to continue improving the taste of their product and get it into “as many talented hands and palates as possible.”

Wild Type has been doing quite a few private tastings lately, culminating in a tasting in Portland, Oregon this June. The startup can currently only make minced salmon and small lox-like pieces of the fish, but hopes to work its way up to full-size filets.

Kolbeck also wants to use the new funds to scale up their cell-based fish production. He told me their goal was to be able to supply a handful of restaurants on a regular basis. This would also drive down production costs. When I spoke to him after the tasting event in Portland, Kolbeck disclosed that one of their salmon sushi rolls would cost $200. Their goal is to get it down to $5 to make it accessible to as many people as possible.

Cell-based meat and seafood companies have been attracting waves of funding lately, but Wild Type’s Series A is a whopper — especially in the cellular aquaculture space. “In terms of later stage funding for cell-based companies, it’s been more focused on poultry and meat,” said Kolbeck. “This is a Series A in the seafood space, which is interesting.” Indeed, cultured seafood companies like BlueNalu and Finless Foods have raised $4.5 million and raised $3.5 million seed rounds, respectively. Earlier this year Shiok Meats, which grows shrimp in a lab, closed a $4.6 million seed round. But Wild Type is the first cell-based seafood company to reel in such hefty funding.

Kolbeck still was hesitant to give a specific date for when they would bring their product to market. But with this new funding in hand, we’re all one step closer to having cell-based salmon sushi on our plates.

June 21, 2019

Wild Type’s Cell-Based Salmon Costs $200, But Not For Long

A few weeks ago Wild Type, the San Francisco-based startup growing salmon in a lab, did a tasting of its cultured salmon.

Sadly I was not there to taste the goods (hint hint, guys). But I did get to connect with Wild Type co-founders Aryé Elfenbein and Justin Kolbeck over the phone this week to learn more about how their dinner went and what’s next for the cellular aquaculture startup.

According to the co-founders, the taste test was a critical step in their R&D process. While there are things they still want to improve on their product — tasters apparently thought the flavor was quite faint and the color wasn’t as vibrant as wild salmon — they were impressed with how the salmon adapted to a variety of dishes.

Wild Type’s salmon falls apart if it’s heated above 212°F, so for now the company is focusing on raw applications. Their first product will be a smoked salmon similar to lox. Apparently Wild Type’s scientists can already produce a thin sheet of salmon that’s 10.5 inches x 11 inches, which can then be sliced, cold smoked, and presumably put on a bagel alongside schmear and capers.

While they eventually want to sell their cell-based lox directly to consumers, the Wild Type founders first need to get their price down. Way down.

Right now, Kolbeck and Elfenbein estimated that it cost roughly $200 dollars to produce one serving of their cultured salmon. (They specifically referenced the cost of to make the eight-piece spicy salmon sushi roll they served at their recent dinner.) Though high-quality wild salmon is pricey, up to $30 a pound, Wild Type still has a ways to go before their fish is cost-competitive with the real thing. Kolbeck explained that they’re currently working on making their animal-free cell media — one of the biggest costs in cellular agriculture/aquaculture — more efficient, which would make the growth process significantly cheaper.

Kolbeck and Elfenbein wouldn’t give a timeline for their product release, but seeing as they won’t launch until they’re at least close to price parity with traditional salmon — roughly one-tenth their current cost — it’ll likely be several years at least.

However, Wild Type does have one significant advantage over companies like JUST and Mosa Meats, which claim to be closer to bringing their cultured meat to market. Fish are cold-blooded, so the startup’s salmon cells can be grown at room temperature. Mammalian and avian cells, on the other hand, have to be grown in little ovens to stay warm. That means that cultured fish requires fewer energy inputs than cultured beef, pork, or chicken, and can also be produced more cheaply.

For now, Wild Type is focused on perfecting their product, reducing growth costs, and planning more tastings of their salmon. Maybe this writer will be able to snag an invite for the next one.

June 14, 2019

Wild Type Debuts New Cultured Salmon in Largest Tasting of Lab-Grown Meat

Last week Wild Type, the West Coast startup growing salmon in a lab, had the first large-scale taste test of its new product.

In a Medium post, the company detailed a test dinner at Portland, Oregon’s Olympia Oyster bar, which included an assortment of cell-based salmon dishes based on “a variety of culinary traditions.” Menu items included Ceviche Verde, salmon tartare, Hawaiian poke, and spicy salmon sushi rolls, all made with the cultured fish. The dinner, which the company claims was the first to feature cell-based food so extensively, wasn’t open to the public, so there’s no indication how good the cultured fish actually tasted.

Founded in 2016, Wild Type raised a $3.5 million seed round to expand its cell-based salmon R&D in 2018. The company plans to initially release minced salmon and lox and work its way up to full-size filets.

It still has quite a few hurdles to overcome. As with most cellular agriculture (or aquaculture) companies, it can only produce relatively small pieces of lab-grown meat due to scaffolding challenges and other growth constraints.

Wild Type’s salmon can also only be served raw. If it’s heated above 212°F, it will become too flaky fall apart. According to Bloomberg the company plans to debut a new version of the salmon that can be cooked in the next few months.

Pricing is also an issue. The company hopes to sell their salmon at a competitive price to real farmed Atlantic salmon: $7 to $8 per pound. As of now, they estimate that the spicy salmon roll served at the dinner cost a whopping $200 to produce. However cellular agriculture/aquaculture companies are rapidly reducing the cost it takes to make cultured meat, mostly due to improvements in growth media, so it’s likely pricing will go down soon.

Wild Type isn’t the only company trying to get in on the seafood alternative market. Finless Foods is hoping to bring its cell-based bluefin tuna to market by the end of 2019, though likely in a very limited release. In Singapore, Shiok Meats is developing cell-based shrimp (and racking up serious funding along the way), and Avant Meats is making lab-grown fish maw in Hong Kong.

It’ll still be a while until we taste any sort of cultured meat or seafood due to high costs, low production capacity, and regulatory hurdles. Wild Type has yet to release a go-to-market date for their cell-based salmon, but some speculate it’ll be as much as 10 years from now.

However, several plant-based seafood companies are already vying for our plates. Good Catch’s plant-based tuna is now available at Whole Foods, and Ocean Hugger Foods makes alternatives to raw tuna and eel out of vegetables. These options may all be better for the environment than fishing or even growing fish cells in a lab, but at least from my experience, it’s much harder to make plants taste like fish than it is to make them taste like a juicy burger.

Regardless, we have to do something about our dwindling seafood supply. Our oceans are rapidly being depleted through overfishing and aquaculture has its own set of issues. If companies like Wild Type can produce tasty fish to relieve some of the pressure from our oceans, I’m all for it. Even if I have to wait a while to try lab-grown spicy tuna sushi for myself.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

  • About
  • Sponsor the Spoon
  • The Spoon Events
  • Spoon Plus

© 2016–2025 The Spoon. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
 

Loading Comments...