• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to navigation
Close Ad

The Spoon

Daily news and analysis about the food tech revolution

  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Connect
    • Custom Events
    • Slack
    • RSS
    • Send us a Tip
  • Advertise
  • Consulting
  • About
The Spoon
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • About

Keatz

December 29, 2019

3 Predictions for the Ghost Kitchen in 2020

In 2019, the idea of a restaurant kitchen with no dining room that would exist solely for the purpose of fulfilling off-premises orders was an intriguing but little-known concept. Fast forward 12 months, and ghost kitchens are now a major talking point in the discussion around how to meet customer demand for delivery and takeout orders. And it’s not just restaurants getting involved. Third-party delivery services like DoorDash have opened their own ghost kitchen facilities, companies like Kitchen United, who provide kitchen infrastructure to other brands, are expanding across the globe, and even non-restaurant food brands are capitalizing on the craze.

It’s still early days for the ghost kitchen concept, and as I noted with The Spoon’s most recent market map, this is a part of the restaurant industry that will change rapidly over the next year as it becomes more commonplace among both restaurants and consumers.

Here are a few things we expect to see happen in 2020.

Ghost kitchens will become the norm for large restaurant chains. 
Last year around this time, I wrote that “where the [ghost kitchen] concept could really shine in 2019 is by taking on delivery orders for existing businesses, so the brick-and-mortar locations of those restaurants don’t have to shoulder the entire burden.”

Without a shadow of a doubt, that began to happen in 2019. In 2020, it will become the norm. Many early adopters of the ghost kitchen concept in 2019 were national or international chain restaurants with the kind of reach and influence that will compel other establishments to take similar steps. Chick-fil-A already rents space from DoorDash’s ghost kitchen facility. Starbucks has teamed up with Alibaba’s Heme supermarkets in China to run ghost kitchens out of the latter’s stores. The coffee giant is also building out its own express stores that will function largely as ghost kitchens for delivery orders. Fat Brands is using its own kitchens to double as ghost kitchens for sister brands.

All of which is to say, many brands will create many iterations of the ghost kitchen concept in 2020. As we move though the next 12 months, which types of ghost kitchens (commissary, in-house, etc.) make the most sense for which brands will become clearer. 

Restaurant brands will compete with their kitchen providers.
Both large chains and virtual restaurant concepts will quite possibly find a new competitor in 2020: the folks renting out the kitchen space they use.

Much like grocery stores display their own brand of pasta on the shelves along side CPG brands (or, for a more web-friendly parallel, Amazon has its own Amazon Basics brand), ghost kitchen providers will start to use their facilities to house their own virtual restaurant concepts that compete with those of their tenants. 

This is already happening. Travis Kalanick’s CloudKitchens startup, which operates a network of ghost kitchen facilities, provides space for brands like Sweetgreen to fulfill off-premises orders. It also houses its own virtual brands like Excuse My French Toast and B*tch Don’t Grill My Cheese. 

Not all kitchen providers will take this route. For example, Kitchen United said recently it did not want to be a restaurant itself.

But for many kitchen providers, offering their own virtual restaurants allows them to own yet-another piece of the restaurant stack and therefore more revenue and the all-important customer data. And as more and more non-restaurant food brands, from diets to celebrity chefs, try out virtual concepts, launching a virtual restaurant will (in theory, at least) get simpler for these kitchen providers to do without incurring much additional overhead. No, B*tch Don’t Grill My Cheese won’t stand a chance against a big brand like Chick-fil-A if a customer is really craving those waffle fries, but in the future, the two entities won’t be working out of the same ghost kitchen facility anyway.

Which leads us to our next point.

Third-party delivery services will open more kitchens. Big brands will follow.
Remember above when I said we’ll see an explosion of big-name restaurant brands adopting the ghost kitchen model? At some point in the future, most of them will be doing it out of kitchens run by third-party delivery services like DoorDash and Uber Eats. That’s not because providers like Kitchen United don’t offer delivery options (they do), but because the delivery companies themselves are approaching the restaurant chains.

DoorDash is a case in point. When the third-party delivery service opened the doors on its own ghost kitchen facility in Redwood City, CA this year, it had four existing restaurant chains onboard — all of whom it approached because the company had user data that said people were looking for that type of food in the California Peninsula area. Chick-fil-A soon signed a lease for exactly the same reason.

This is almost a no-brainer. Restaurants already working with delivery companies use these services for things like marketing, technical fulfillment, and last-mile logistics. Adding kitchen space to the stack seems almost a foregone conclusion.

The other thing ghost kitchens are likely to encounter at some point in 2020 is a reality check. At the moment, optimism is flowing into the sector alongside the millions in capital companies are raising. Soon enough, though, the questions will start pouring in. Who gets to own the customer data? Can ghost kitchens become sustainable or will they just pile more trash into the ocean via takeout boxes? Is the model actually profitable, and for whom? Expect these and many other questions to surface in the next year as the ghost kitchen goes mainstream. 

December 8, 2019

Spoon Market Map: Ghost Kitchens in 2019

Just half a decade ago, the phrase “ghost kitchen” referred to restaurants that looked legit on Grubhub and Seamless but were actually digital fronts for unregulated kitchens. In other words, chicken tenders from what appeared to be a local restaurant might actually have been cooked in someone’s apartment.

Then the delivery boom went off, thanks largely to the growth of third-party services like Grubhub and DoorDash, and by the many digital channels through which customers could suddenly get food. Order tickets proliferated for restaurants, but so too did the stress around how to fulfill those orders without over-burdening the in-house kitchen staff.

The answer to the problem? Take the restaurant out of the kitchen.

In the last few years, restaurants have been moving many of their operations around delivery and to-go orders to dedicated kitchen spaces outside the main restaurant location. The name “ghost kitchen” has stuck around, but now it’s a health-department-friendly term for these spaces that act as hubs for off-premises orders.

But actually, there are many names nowadays for the concept: ghost kitchen, virtual kitchen, cloud kitchen, the (slightly nauseating) description “kitchen as a service.” All those phrases amount the same thing: a kitchen facility that exists solely for the purpose of helping restaurants cook and fulfill to-go orders and get them into the hands of delivery couriers. There is no dining room or front-of-house staff in a ghost kitchen, the tech-stack is more streamlined than that of a full-service restaurant, and, increasingly, the location is completely separate from a restaurant’s dine-in location(s). Now, too, there are also kitchens on (literal) wheels, which add yet-another piece of mobility to the business model. 

To help you navigate the evolving world of ghost kitchens, we’ve created a market map for your reference. This market map is intended to be a snapshot of the current ghost kitchen landscape in 2019. It’s not comprehensive, and we expect both it and the overall landscape to change drastically over the next 12 months. That means you can expect to see this map updated regularly. As always, we welcome suggestions for additional companies and players in this space.

Have suggestions? Drop us an email.

1. Kitchen Infrastructure Providers

The largest category in ghost kitchens right now, Kitchen Infrastructure Providers can be likened to cloud computing providers: they rent companies the space and tools needed to run a business, either as a flat-fee model for on a pay-as-you-go basis. 

Kitchen United, for example, charges a monthly membership fee that includes rent, equipment, storage, and services like dishwashing. Reef, which originally made a name for itself reinventing the concept of the parking garage, offers these things as well as direct partnerships with major third-party delivery companies like DoorDash and Postmates.   

Normally these facilities are large, warehouse-like buildings that hold multiple “restaurants” under a single roof. For large restaurant operators with multiple chains looking to fulfill extra demand brought on by delivery or test out new concepts without incurring too much risk, these are ideal.

Multi-unit chains can also use these spaces to reach customers in areas where they might not have a brick-and-mortar store. Chick-fil-A is widening its reach in the SF Bay Area by working out of DoorDash’s newly opened facility.

2. Restaurant-operated Kitchens

For some restaurants, running a ghost kitchen operation themselves makes more sense than teaming up with a third-party kitchen provider. This is often the case with smaller, independent restaurants, whose ghost kitchen might consist of nothing more than an area of the restaurant’s existing location(s) dedicated to fulfilling off-premises orders. Or it might apply to multi-unit chains who simply want to expand to new areas and don’t have the capital or inclination to deal with the burden of a full-service restaurant. Colombian chain Muy is one such company, having started as a dine-in restaurant before expanding its ghost kitchens to serve more areas of Latin America.

The most notable of all the companies in this category right now is Starbucks. In addition to building out “to-go” stores that exist solely for the purpose of fulfilling off-premises orders, the company has also partnered with Alibaba to turn parts of the latter’s Hema supermarkets into ghost kitchens in China.

The boundaries around this category are especially fluid. In other words, just because you operate your own ghost kitchen in one part of the country doesn’t mean you can’t team up with a third-party provider in another, as The Halal Guys and Chick-fil-A have done.

3. Virtual Restaurant Providers

This is where the lines really start to blur between restaurant, kitchen provider, and delivery company. Anyone can make a virtual restaurant, and as the category in our map shows, more than just restaurants are trying their hand at food concepts that can only be ordered through digital channels and are prepared in a ghost kitchen. Whole30, for example, is a diet concept better known for its cookbooks than its dealings with the restaurant industry. The folks behind that brand teamed up with Grubhub and restaurant company Lettuce Entertain You to create a virtual restaurant offering meals with Whole30-approved foods. 

On the other hand, a company like Keatz runs a network of virtual restaurants it houses beneath the roof of its own ghost kitchens. Taster, based out of France, creates native restaurant brands for food delivery companies like Uber Eats and Deliveroo. Food is cooked in Taster-run kitchens.

4. Mobile Kitchens

In slightly more its own category, companies like Ono Food Co. and Zume are creating robotic, self-contained kitchens on wheels that offer restaurant experiences that can be tailored to specific neighborhoods in a city and also plug into third-party delivery services.

Restaurants can also partner with these kitchens on wheels to expand their reach into new markets, as &Pizza has done by teaming up with Zume.

What’s Next for Ghost Kitchens

Ghost kitchens will become the norm for multi-unit chains. With off-premises orders expected to drive the majority of restaurant sales growth over the next decade, multi-unit brands (think Panera, Chipotle, etc.) will find ghost kitchens a cost-effective way to meet this demand without overburdening existing restaurants. The majority of them will rent space from kitchen infrastructure providers, as Chick-fil-A is currently doing with DoorDash. 

There will be an explosion of delivery-only brands. Since ghost kitchens provide a cheaper, faster way for food entrepreneurs and small restaurants alike to test-drive new concepts, we will see an influx of delivery- and pickup-only brands come out of these kitchens over the next year. Many will be born inside the walls of facilities like Kitchen United or CloudKitchens. Meanwhile, the number of virtual restaurant networks like that of Keatz will increase. 

Artificial Intelligence will be designed into the kitchen. AI is a really broad term that’s often misused. That fact aside, its presence in the restaurant industry is here to stay, and in ghost kitchens, it will prove itself valuable for everything from tracking ingredients to helping staff curb food waste. On the consumer end, we expect to see the technology more deeply integrated into the apps and websites from which customers order, improving recommendations and upselling opportunities.  

More non-restaurant food brands will launch virtual restaurants. In keeping with a trend recently made popular by Whole30 and Bon Apétit, food brands, diets, celebrity chefs, and other non-restaurant businesses will team up with third parties to launch delivery and pickup concepts. Grubhub and Uber Eats are two such third parties already doing this. Expect many more such partnerships — soon.

Bonus: The tech stack will get pared down. No front of house means no POS, right? Quite possibly. With less (or no) customer-facing technology like digital menu boards, self-order kiosks, and tabletop ordering, much of the restaurant tech on the market today becomes irrelevant in a ghost kitchen setting. As the folks at Reforming Retail noted recently, “under this scenario the POS is just an ordering node in the cloud that outputs your menu to a consumer and sends orders to your kitchen.”

That doesn’t mean restaurant tech is going by the wayside. Some ghost kitchens, like those of Muy, have a walkup option where customers order at kiosks onsite, and there will doubtless be new solutions created that are specifically for the ghost kitchen. But the tools of tomorrow’s ghost kitchen won’t look a thing like today’s bloated restaurant-management tech stack. For everyone involved, that’s a bonus.

March 22, 2019

Virtual Kitchen Network Keatz Raises €12M for Its Food-First Delivery Concept

Berlin, Germany-based Keatz has raised €12 million (~$13.6 million USD) in new funding for its virtual restaurant operation, TechCrunch reports. The round was led by Project A Ventures, Atlantic Labs, UStart, K Fund, and JME Ventures, with participation from RTP Global. This recent round brings Keatz’ total funding to €19.4 million (~$22 million USD).

Keatz operates a network of 10 virtual kitchens throughout Europe — that is, kitchens created specifically for delivery orders, which customers place online or via an app. Keatz’ menu items are currently available through Deliveroo, Foodora, Lieferheld, and Pizza.de.

Rather than partner with restaurants, as many virtual kitchens do, Keatz has taken a less-traveled route and keeps its own portfolio of restaurants created by an in-house culinary team. Also different from most virtual kitchens out there is that Keatz pre-cooks all food in a central kitchen, then ships frozen meals to smaller assembly kitchens. As my colleague Chris Albrecht pointed out recently, “this hub-and-spoke approach to meal creation also allows Keatz to easily swap new brand concepts in and out at each location.” So if Vietnamese cuisine isn’t selling in one area, the concept can be easily swapped out for fish ‘n’ chips, or whatever happens to be in high demand in that vicinity.

Right now, Keatz’ restaurants include vegan food, Hawaiian Poke, Thai curry, a soup brand, Mexican food, and salads and wraps. Keatz chooses its menu items based on which foods are best suited to delivery — that is, food that can withstand an extra 15 minutes getting jostled around during a car or bike trip. “We believe the last unsolved part in food delivery is the preparation of food itself,” Keatz co-founder Paul Gebhardt told TechCrunch.

He would hardly be alone in that opinion. In fact, a growing number of restaurants, restaurant tech companies, and others are starting to focus more on the food itself as the best way to improve the delivery experience for customers. Taster, headquartered in Paris, France, runs kitchens “with military-like discipline” and chooses foods suited to the delivery process.

In the U.S., all manner of companies offer delivery-only concepts with this “food first” focus. ClusterTruck operates a virtual kitchen with an enormous menu of delivery-friendly food items it creates, executes, and delivers itself. And earlier this year, Dig Inn launched its Room Service concept, using virtual kitchens that plan their menus around food that actually gets better in transit. “At the end of the day, the guest isn’t going to come back to you because your technology is amazing, they’ll come back to you because the food is amazing,” Dig Inn Director of Offsite Scott Landers told me recently.

But whether it’s avoiding soggy food or just providing more efficient delivery operations for existing restaurants, companies up and down the restaurant industry are now participating in the virtual kitchen craze. Uber turned heads last week when news broke that it was piloting its own kitchens in Paris. Kitchen United is expanding at a rapid pace, renting kitchen space to restaurants who need or want more space to fulfill delivery orders. And Deliveroo has operated its own kitchens in Europe for some time now.

Keatz launched in 2016. The company says it plans to use the new funding for further expansion of both its food portfolio and the number of kitchens it operates.

November 26, 2018

Keatz Combines Frozen Food with Satellite Kitchens for Restaurant Delivery

One of the reasons Amazon had to exit the U.K. restaurant delivery market after just two years was Deliveroo. By creating virtual kitchens for restaurants and locking those restaurants into exclusive agreements, Deliveroo was able to build a moat around its business so deep that even Amazon gave up going against them in the U.K. And if a mega-giant like Amazon can’t compete in restaurant delivery, what chance do smaller players have?

It’s a question Berlin-based Keatz may have at least one answer to. Keatz owns and operates a number of virtual, delivery-only restaurant chains in Europe. They don’t, however, build out full-scale kitchen operations at each of its locations. Instead, the company uses a central kitchen to pre-cook the food, which is then frozen and shipped to smaller Keatz “assembly kitchens” in the markets where it operates.

These assembly kitchens are smaller than 200 square meters (~2,100 sq. ft.), which makes them relatively inexpensive to set up and operate in various European cities. Each location then, can also be standardized with the same equipment, because they are all just reheating the food, so those is no need for specialized equipment in various markets.

This hub-and-spoke approach to meal creation also allows Keatz to easily swap new brand concepts in and out at each location. Let’s say Thai food is no longer making money in a particular market. They can close that virtual restaurant down, ship frozen Chinese Food to that location instead, use all the same re-heating equipment and voila! There’s a brand new virtual restaurant. Each location can hold up to 10 virtual restaurants.

Once an assembly kitchen is up and running, Keatz relies on in-app promotion in existing delivery services like Deliveroo, Delivery Hero or Uber Eats. Keatz currently doesn’t advertise their virtual restaurants in the real world, but Joaquín Mencía, CCO for Keatz, told me that is something they are exploring as they continue to expand.

Founded two years ago, Keatz now serves areas in Berlin, Frankfurt, Barcelona and Amsterdam. Mencía said the company is looking to open three more facilities in Europe before the end of the year. Keatz is looking to expand aggressively in 2019 and raised €7.4 million (~$8.38M USD) to fuel that growth.

Keatz’s advantage will be the control it has over its own supply chain, as it will have deep insight into the meals it’s selling and can create new concepts relatively quickly without having to go through the logistics of bringing on a third party restaurant as a partner (or building out a kitchen specific to that restaurant’s needs).

I obviously don’t live in Europe, but I wonder how a continent so steeped in culinary tradition will take to frozen restaurant foods. People ordering restaurant meals for delivery probably aren’t as concerned with tradition and won’t care if the food has been previously frozen, as long as it tastes good.

Primary Sidebar

Footer

  • About
  • Sponsor the Spoon
  • The Spoon Events
  • Spoon Plus

© 2016–2025 The Spoon. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
 

Loading Comments...