• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to navigation
Close Ad

The Spoon

Daily news and analysis about the food tech revolution

  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Connect
    • Custom Events
    • Slack
    • RSS
    • Send us a Tip
  • Advertise
  • Consulting
  • About
The Spoon
  • Home
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Advertise
  • About

San Francisco DA Sues DoorDash Over Worker Classification

by Jennifer Marston
June 17, 2020June 17, 2020Filed under:
  • Business of Food
  • Delivery & Commerce
  • Featured
  • Restaurant Tech
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin is suing DoorDash over misclassifying its delivery drivers and couriers as independent contractors, rather than employees, according to TechCrunch. The lawsuit seeks for DoorDash to stop classifying its workers as such or face a $2,500 fine for each violation.  

According to the suit:

“DoorDash’s misclassification of its Dashers was no mistake, but instead a calculated decision made to reduce the costs of doing business at the expense of the very workers providing the company’s core service of delivery: the delivery of merchandise from merchants to customers.”

The suit comes months after California’s AB 5 was signed into law. AB 5 lays out exactly which types of workers can be classified as independent contractors, using the ABC test as criteria. As the suit outlines, DoorDash’s workers don’t meet the criteria in the ABC test to be considered independent contractors. Instead, they should be assumed to be employees with the same access to healthcare, workers comp, overtime pay, and other benefits W-2 employees receive.

The issue of benefits for gig workers is an especially hot-button one right now, thanks to the pandemic. Gig workers delivering restaurant meals and/or groceries have so far been considered “essential” and allowed to continue making deliveries during shelter-in-place mandates. That put a lot of food on consumers’ tables, but it also put workers’ health at risk. As contractors, those workers don’t have automatic access to healthcare of paid sick leave. As one worker said at the beginning of the crisis, “Staying home won’t pay the bills.”

To be fair, most third-party delivery services responded to the issue back when the pandemic first accelerated, offering some financial compensation for workers affected by COVID-19. Other moves to better protect workers have been the result of government involvement, as when a New York Court ruled that Postmates drivers were eligible for unemployment during the pandemic.

DoorDash itself has been offering financial assistance through its COVID-19 Financial Assistance program. Dashers impacted by the pandemic can submit a claim and be eligible for up to two weeks of assistance. And the company recently entered into a public-private partnership with the Pennsylvania Office of the Attorney General to further expand financial, healthcare, and childcare assistance to Dashers.

All those efforts are specific to the pandemic, though. Boudin’s lawsuit seems aimed at the long-term situation of Dashers and other gig workers, and what protections they can receive when there isn’t a global health crisis in play.

Not every worker wants to be classified as an employee, though. A slew of responses to one of Boudin’s tweets this week shows that some gig economy workers prefer to be contractors. “Most of us drivers want to remain Independent Contractors because of the flexibility and because [w]e make more than minimum wage,” wrote one. Another responded that “As an independent contractor I’m outraged that you’re taking away my flexibility to barely afford to pay my health bills even though I’m working seemongly [sic] nonstop for the same one or two companies.” And in the words of another, “We didn’t fucking WANT relief. All he will accomplish here is making us unemployed and homeless.”

Plenty of other gig workers are in favor of laws like AB 5 (“Thank you! They stole my tips!” one person responded to Boudin’s tweet).

For third-party delivery services, turning contract workers into employees would be an expensive endeavor — more expensive even than spending $90 million to fight AB 5, which is exactly what DoorDash, along with Uber and Lyft, pledged to do. Having to pay workers health insurance, overtime, and sick leave would further erode these companies’ chances of profitability, which is another major issue in the gig economy world.

It recently came to light that DoorDash is near closing a new round of funding that would value the company at over $15 billion. The company filed to go public last year and, according to sources, is still planning on a listing for 2020. That would make the profitability issue even more pressing for the third-party delivery service, so we can expect DoorDash to continue fighting hard against AB 5.


Related

DoorDash to Pay $2.5M to Settle Lawsuit Over Former Tipping Policies

DoorDash will pay a $2.5 million settlement to the Washington, D.C. attorney general’s office over a lawsuit filed in 2019 about the delivery service’s controversial tipping policies. Attorney General Karl Racine announced yesterday that DoorDash has agreed to the settlement “to resolve allegations that it mislead D.C. consumers and used…

DoorDash Files for IPO, Could Start Trading in December

DoorDash unveiled its public S-1 filing this morning after confidentially filing to go public earlier this year. The San Francisco-based third-party delivery service is expected to begin trading on the NYSE in mid-December. Reports of the service going public as soon as 2020 first surfaced in August, along with hints…

Report: DoorDash May Go Public in 2020 Amid Broader Delivery Consolidation

DoorDash could file for an IPO as soon as the fourth quarter of 2020, according to “sources familiar with the matter” who spoke to Bloomberg. The third-party delivery company is reportedly “taking steps” to go public in November or December of this year through a traditional IPO, rather than a…

Get the Spoon in your inbox

Just enter your email and we’ll take care of the rest:

Find us on some of these other platforms:

  • Apple Podcasts
  • Spotify
Tagged:
  • delivery

Post navigation

Previous Post Dumpling Raises $6.5M Series A for Grocery Delivery Platform
Next Post More COVID-Related Cuts for Food Delivery: Grab Lays Off 5 Percent of Its Workforce

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get The Spoon in Your Inbox

The Spoon Podcast Network!

Feed your mind! Subscribe to one of our podcasts!

Is Posha the Robotic Heir to the Thermomix? The Founders Sure Hope So
From Aspiring Pro Surfer to Delivery Robot CEO with Coco’s Zach Rash
Mark Cuban to Speak at SKS 2025
This Culinary Tech Inventor Thought He Could Build Some Parts For His Latest Gadget in the US. Then He Called Around.
Thermomix Has Long Been a Leader in Cooking Automation, But Now They’re Going Full Robot

Footer

  • About
  • Sponsor the Spoon
  • The Spoon Events
  • Spoon Plus

© 2016–2025 The Spoon. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.