• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Skip to navigation
Close Ad

The Spoon

Daily news and analysis about the food tech revolution

  • Home
  • News
    • Alternative Protein
    • Business of Food
    • Connected Kitchen
    • COVID-19
    • Delivery & Commerce
    • Foodtech
    • Food Waste
    • Future of Drink
    • Future Food
    • Future of Grocery
    • Podcasts
    • Startups
    • Restaurant Tech
    • Robotics, AI & Data
  • Spoon Plus Central
  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Connect
    • Send us a Tip
    • Spoon Newsletters
    • Slack
    • RSS
    • The Spoon Food Tech Survey Panel
  • Advertise
  • About
    • Staff
  • Become a Member
The Spoon
  • Home
  • News
    • Alternative Protein
    • Business of Food
    • Connected Kitchen
    • Foodtech
    • Food Waste
    • Future Food
    • Future of Grocery
    • Restaurant Tech
    • Robotics, AI & Data
  • Spoon Plus Central
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Jobs
  • Slack
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Become a Member

Grubhub’s New Phone Order System Is ‘Insufficient’ in Addressing the Service’s “Bogus” Fee Controversy

by Jennifer Marston
January 10, 2020January 10, 2020Filed under:
  • Business of Food
  • Delivery & Commerce
  • Featured
  • Restaurant Tech
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

In a letter this week to New York City Council members, Grubhub announced a new phone ordering system meant to address accusations of the service charging restaurants erroneous fees for phone orders. But NYC is not impressed, with Mark Gjonaj, who chairs the small business committee, calling the moves “insufficient.”

With the new system, which Grubhub has dubbed a “common sense step,” customers who call a restaurant through the Grubhub or Seamless platforms will be asked to press #1 to place an order and #2 for any other matter. The change is effective immediately, not just in NYC but nationwide for Grubhub/Seamless users. 

The change comes after Grubhub came under fire in 2019 for its controversial billing practice for phone orders. With the old system, the service would bill restaurants for any call made to them via the Grubhub/Seamless platform that was longer than 45 seconds, regardless of whether that call resulted in an order or was simply a customer checking the status of an order. Restaurants were charged anywhere between $4 and $9 per call. On top of that, when the NYC Council held an oversight hearing last June to address issues surrounding third-party food delivery, it was made known that restaurants couldn’t view phone-order charges made 60 days prior. 

While that look-back period, as it was called, was eventually extended to include charges made 120 days prior, the NYC Council wasn’t satisfied and in October threatened to pursue legislative action if Grubhub didn’t fix its phone order issues. Grubhub launched a task force in response meant to address the problems.

The new phone order system is part of the findings Grubhub released from that task force. The company also said it is doubling the number of account advisors who can “assist restaurants with phone order inquiries,” though no more specifics were provided.

The Council and others are not impressed, it seems. 

“There is nothing in the proposed changes that would make whole the thousands of restaurants that have already paid for what in many cases were erroneous phone order fees,” Gjonaj said in a statement on Thursday. “These are hard earned dollars that could mean the difference between a restaurant staying open or having to close their doors. This is money that Grubhub was never entitled to in the first place.”

Andrew Rigie, the executive director of the New York City Hospitality Alliance, said that “the burden should not remain on the restaurants to listen to messages to determine which fees are bogus.” He added that the major question remaining is whether Grubhub will pay back the money they owe on past erroneous charges.

With the new system, restaurants will now be allowed to listen to every phone order they are billed for, but the look-back period for phone calls remains fixed at 120 days. Grubhub said it would handle issues surrounding older calls on a case-by-case basis.


Related

Get the Spoon in your inbox

Just enter your email and we’ll take care of the rest:

Find us on some of these other platforms:

  • Apple Podcasts
  • Spotify
Tagged:
  • GrubHub
  • third-party delivery

Post navigation

Previous Post New Age Meats, the First Company to Debut Cell-based Pork Sausage, Raises $2.7M
Next Post Starbucks’ Chinese Competitor Luckin to Launch IoT-powered Self-service Coffee Machines

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Get The Spoon in Your Inbox

Subscribe to Our Podcast!

Subscribe in iTunes or listen on Spotify.

Food Tech News: Oat Milk Gin and a Traveling Grocery Store
Something in the Air (Protein) These Days
Podcast: Talking the Future of Food With Seth Goldman
Report: Impossible Foods Planning to Go Public
ReFed and Others Introduce a New Policy Action Plan to Fight Food Waste

Footer

  • About
  • Sponsor the Spoon
  • The Spoon Events
  • Spoon Plus

© 2016–2021 The Spoon. All rights reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.